Thursday, September 05, 2013

I argue factually that there is a strict tone of hypocrisy concerning those who call themselves "Pro-Choice!" Observe the following:

1. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she opposes people having the option to pay into social security or not? 2. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes that a florists should not have the choice to decide whether or not to sell to a gay couples' wedding? 3. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes the courts should force a man to pay child support, or he runs the risk of wage garnishment or imprisonment? 4. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes federal tax dollars should be forced to pay for funding abortion clinics, even if those people oppose abortion? 5. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believe our children should not be allowed to go to any school he or she wants? 6. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she is opposed to a 'right to work' states who do not force people to join unions and pay fees? 7. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes in regulations regarding how much soda a person can drink in a restaurant? 8. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes in what is called 'hate speech legislation' to silence those who disagree with their position? 9. How can a person be pro choice, if he or she believes people do not have a right to keep what they earn?

No comments: